took the photograph, the object may have been unmistakably enormous in person.
But once reduced to a tiny mark on a screen, the image became almost impossible to analyze.
There was no clear feather pattern.
No identifiable head.
No reliable measurement of the wings.
No distinctive markings.
No close-up image capable
of settling the debate.
And without those details, the photographs could not provide a definitive answer. EditPhotos
Biologists Asked the Questions That Mattered
Wildlife experts looking into an unusual bird report
